Category: today i learned (til)

health, fitness, medicine, environment, ecology, how to learn tricky topics in science and math, new discoveries, news, current events

  • Overcoming Depression at the Level of the Brain

    Overcoming Depression at the Level of the Brain

    Depression is a common but serious mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness. Many people, ranging from young to old, suffer from depression. It is especially prevalent in young adults and college students. Those suffering from depression often have trouble doing every day activities and sometimes may feel that life is hopeless.

    However, since depression has been around for so long and is so common, the good news is there are numerous treatments for it that have been proven successful. Two of the most common treatments are antidepressant medication (SSRIs) and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Here, we take a closer look at how these two treatments work in battling depression at the level of the brain.

    Levels of serotonergic neurotransmission play an important role in determining mood. Depression is said to caused by low levels of serotonergic neurotransmission. SSRIs counter these low levels by interfering with the serotonin transporter 5-HTT—it causes slower reuptake of serotonin. This causes the low levels of serotonin in the brain to be elevated, thus relieving depression. Like antidepressant medication, cognitive-behavioral therapy also produces changes in the brain when treating depression. In those suffering from depression, their hippocampus decreases in size by the constant release of glucocorticoids due to stress. This, in turn, creates more stress and depression. It has been found that after completing CBT, those with depression show significant improvement in their depression, which is associated with significant increases in the hippocampus. Both antidepressant medication and CBT are successful in treating depression, however how they affect the brain in different ways to achieve this.

    Those who struggle with depression also face risk of relapse after discontinuing treatment. In terms of preventing relapse, it has been shown that CBT has significantly less risk of relapse than medication. In one study, it was found that the percent of relapse after treatment was 30% for CBT versus 76% for antidepressant medication. A reason for this disparity may be that CBT teaches patients how to change the way they think and in turn, how they feel and act, so that even after they discontinue therapy, they can continue to apply the skills they have learned in therapy. Medication only changes the serotonin levels in the brain with no conscious effort on the person’s part, so it is harder to prevent depression after discontinuing the medication.

    In conclusion, both antidepressant medication and cognitive-behavioral therapy relieve depression by altering the brain. Medication works by inhibiting serotonin reuptake, which elevates the low levels of serotonin in people with depression. CBT helps patients change the way they perceive thoughts, which has been associated with increased hippocampus size, which helps prevent stress and depression. However, when discontinuing treatment, those who completed CBT are at a much lower risk of relapse than those who took medication, as CBT teaches people skills they can apply even after treatment ends. It is often recommended to those suffering from depression a combination of medication and therapy, so that they have the most promising outlook on overcoming their depression.

     

    Goldapple, K. (2004, January 01). Modulation of Cortical-Limbic Pathways in Major Depression. Retrieved January 16, 2019, from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/481941
    Hollon, S. D. (2005, April 01). Prevention of Relapse Following Cognitive Therapy vs Medications in Moderate to Severe Depression. Retrieved January 16, 2019, from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/208447
    Schafer, W. R. (n.d.). How Do Antidepressants Work? Prospects for Genetic … Retrieved January 16, 2019, from https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(00)80042-2
  • A History of Bias: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

    A History of Bias: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

    We’ve come a very long way in the way we perceive medicine and how we use it. We’ve grown from studying the humors of medieval times and performing brain lobotomies in the 1900s to the most complex surgeries and medicines that can save millions of lives. But sometimes the question that isn’t asked is, what was the cost of this new knowledge? Were the decades of long, painstaking research and repeated experiments worth it when some subjects were put through experiments that ended in permanent injury or their death? There has always been a long and dark history to the cases of medical bases, especially in the case of race, sex, and gender. In this article, I want to focus on racial bias, discussing the story of the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, why it is an example of medical bias and the impact that this bias made on history and future research.

    What Started This?

    In 1932, a study was started by the Public Health Service to study the natural history of syphilis to justify treatment programs for black males. The experiment was meant to build upon a similar study on untreated syphilis in Norway in 1928. The initial goal of the study was to follow the disease in black men for six to nine months, and have a treatment phase for the subjects after. The study took place at the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama and the subjects were recruited from Macon County, which is part of the Black Belt, a region with rich soil and black sharecroppers. The participants were mostly poor and illiterate, signing up mainly for the benefits described to them. About 600 participants were recruited, 399 who had untreated syphilis and 201 who acted as control subjects.

    What Went Wrong?

    The problem with this study that caused so much controversy was what the research participants were told about the study and what would happen to them. The participants were told that they were being treated for bad blood, which was used to describe issues like fatigue, anemia, and syphilis. They were told that they would receive medical exams, rides to and from the clinics, meals on examination days, free treatment for minor ailments and guarantees that provisions would be made after their deaths in terms of burial stipends paid to their survivors. The participants were told that the study would last for six months in 1932, but it went on until 1972. Another problem with the ethics of the study was the fact that the participants gave no written or informed consent to be experimented on. There was no evidence to show they had an option to leave the study, and the treatment they were given was slightly effective and highly toxic. After years of research and generations of unknown diseases transferred to spouses, children, and many affected, a report by the Associated Press was released in 1972 about the experiment, which was then forced to shut down a month after. Even though a class-action lawsuit led to nine million dollars given to the participants and an apology was given by President Clinton, the consequences brought to the participants and their families couldn’t be undone. The last survivor of the experiment passed away in 2004, and the last widow receiving benefits from the Tuskegee Health Benefit Program passed away in 2009.

    A memorandum from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare in November 1972 requiring the Tuskeegee Syphillis Study to be terminated, and for all remaining “participants” to be given the cure.

    How Has It Affected Research & Medicine Today?

    Despite the heartbreaking story of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, it has helped to change how researchers approach studies similar to it. The study led to the creation of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research and the National Research Act, as well as the establishment of institutional review boards, or IRBs for institutions receiving federal support. Since the end of the study, IRBs require that all participants in a study are willing and voluntary patients. In the end, because of the syphilis study, the U.S. was able to become a more ethical place for research, even creating the Tuskegee Bioethics Center, a national center for research and health care.

    Sources:

    About the USPHS Syphilis Study. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2019, from https://www.tuskegee.edu/about-us/centers-of-excellence/bioethics-center/about-the-usphs-syphilis-study.

    Brown, D. N. L. (2019, August 26). ‘You’ve got bad blood’: The horror of the Tuskegee syphilis experiment. Retrieved October 25, 2019, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/05/16/youve-got-bad-blood-the-horror-of-the-tuskegee-syphilis-experiment/.

    CDC. (2015, December 22). Tuskegee Study – Timeline – CDC – NCHHSTP. Retrieved October 25, 2019, from https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm.

    Heller, J., Burns, L., Merritt, C., Corine, Thompson, M., Sam, … Bryant, D. (2018, April 13). Generations later, the effects of the Tuskegee syphilis study linger. Retrieved October 25, 2019, from https://www.statnews.com/2017/05/10/tuskegee-syphilis-study/.

    Jones, J. H. (1993). Bad blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: Free Press.

  • Health Shot: Vitamin Overdose

    Health Shot: Vitamin Overdose

    Too much of a good thing is even better? Right? Wrong. Turns out with vitamins, this is not the case. The Vitamin market is a $23.3 Billion industry, and we are increasingly turning to these convenient capsules for a quick fix. The effect of vitamins is a U curve – too little has negative effects, but so does too much. A moderate amount has the best effects on the body – but this can be hard to achieve with vitamin supplements. Vitamins usually have 1-10x the recommended daily allowance in their pills, and people take these without question. With public opinion largely being that vitamins are a revolution, I want to shed some light on how overdosing on some of the most popular supplements can have detrimental effects.

    Vitamin D

    Vitamin D manages calcium in your blood, bones and gut and helps cells all over your body to communicate properly. Since the rise of sedentary lifestyles, many have been turning to Vitamin D supplements over being outside in the sun. Large overdoses of vitamin D (100x the daily allowance for many months) can cause calcium buildup in the blood, called Hypercalcemia This buildup can result in persistent nausea and frequent vomiting. Additionally, the calcium buildup in the blood can cause kidney damage when the calcium binds with phosphate and forms crystals in tissues. In a case series conducted in Kashmir, India, researchers found that the Vitamin D prescribed by physicians to treat deficiencies was far exceeded the required daily amount, and pushed patients to hyperclacemia. In their conclusions, the researchers cautioned against taking a seemingly innocuous vitamin in large doses.

    Vitamin A

    Vitamin A is important for eye heath and helps prevent eye diseases like Age-related macular degeneration. However, Acute Vitamin A toxicity can occur when a single excessively high dose and chronic toxicity when 10x the recommended daily amount is taken over a long period. Side effects can include headaches, vision disturbances, joint pain, and skin irritation. Worse, toxicity can impact fetal health and even cause birth defects of the  eye, skull, lungs, and heart. The national institutes of health warns pregnant women about taking high dose Vitamin A supplements.

    Vitamin E

    Vitamin E is important to important to vision, reproduction, and the health of your blood, brain and skin. In a clinical trial called SELECT (Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial), 35,000 men 50 years and older took Vitamin E  and Selenium supplements for 5.5 years and then were observed for 1.5 years following. Men tho took Vitamin E supplements alone had a 17% increased risk of prostate cancer compared to men on the placebo pill. Men taking vitamin E and selenium both also had an increased risk of prostate cancer, but in lower amounts. After analyzing the results, the SELECT team concluded that the vitamin dose (400IU/day) given was far too high based on the U shaped curve. The recommendation from the SELECT team was that men should not take vitamin supplements for cancer prevention.

    The Takeaway

    As the negative repercussions of vitamin overdoses continue to come to light, researchers are starting to question the practice of prescribing vitamins to those with deficiencies in high doses. As consumers of vitamins, we have the responsibility to ensure that we are getting our vitamins in reasonable quantities through vitamins or sticking to natural sources. Next time you decide to pop a pill, you might want to flip the bottle around and get a better look at what you’re having!

     

    Sources:

    Nicastro, H. L., & Dunn, B. K. (n.d.). CHAPTER 25. The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT): Prevention of Prostate Cancer Using Selenium and/or Vitamin E in the SELECT Cancer Prevention Trial. Food and Nutritional Components in Focus Selenium,428-457. Retrieved from https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/Consortia/members/select.html.

    Office of Dietary Supplements – Vitamin A. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminA-HealthProfessional/

    Penniston, K. L., & Tanumihardjo, S. A. (n.d.). Vitamin A in dietary supplements and fortified foods: Too much of a good thing? Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12963949.

    Trend Insights: Vitamins & Supplements. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.fona.com/trend-insights-vitamins-supplements/.

     

     

     

  • Psychedelics

    Psychedelics

    Introduction:

    Microdosing is the use of micro amounts of psychedelic substances on a consistent basis (Anderson). Psychedelics, such as LSD and psilocybin (street names acid and shrooms), are “powerful psychoactive substances that alter perception and mood and affect numerous cognitive processes” (Nichols 266). Recent studies have shown that full-doses of these substances used for psychotherapy decreased depression and anxiety in cancer patients (Johnstad). The theory behind microdosing is that small amounts of psychedelics can help increase creativity and problem-solving abilities (Johnstad).

    Psychedelics have been used for centuries sometimes as part of cultural rituals. After the discovery of serotonin in the brain, researchers believed that the effects of psychedelics were linked to serotonin. After studies were completed on rats, it turns out they were somewhat correct. Researchers, now, believe that psychedelics are agonists or partial agonists meaning they combine with receptors in the brain to achieve the psychological effects (Kenakin; Nichols). The brain receptor that’s affected is serotonin 5-hydroxtryptamine 2A (Nichols).

    Studies:

    Due to legal restrictions, psychedelic studies are limited. There are several self-reported studies from the US where people voluntarily reported how they feel when they microdose, and there was a singular study published in 2018 from the Netherlands that explored microdosing in a scientific setting.

    In one of the self-reported studies, Microdosing psychedelics: personality, mental health, and creativity differences in microdosers, microdosers showed significantly lower scores on “dysfunctional attitudes. . .  and negative emotionality” meaning they reacted more positively to life experiences (Anderson, et al. 731). Microdosers also had significantly higher wisdom, open-mindedness, and creativity scores which agrees with the theories stating that microdosing makes people more creative and better at problem solving (Anderson, et al.).

    Another self-reported study, Powerful substances in tiny amounts: An interview study of psychedelic microdosing, looked extensively at 21 microdosers. These microdosers reported “improved mood, cognition, and creativity” (Johnstad), but some reported that they quit the practice due to cons outweighing the pros. Some people had issues with preforming tasks like driving or work, and others had issues like accidental overdosing (meaning that they experienced hallucinations and other aspects caused by a full dose of a psychedelic). Mushrooms, in particular, have varying amounts of psilocybin, so it’s hard to ingest an accurate amount when microdosing (Johnstad).

    The study titled Exploring the effect of microdosing psychedelics on creativity in an open-label natural setting is the only study that tries to quantify the effects of microdosing on cognitive abilities. Before microdosing, participants completed three different tasks meant to test their convergent, divergent, and fluid thinking. The participants then consumed a small amount of psychedelics and performed the tasks again. The researchers concluded that convergent and divergent thinking where enhanced by the psychedelics while fluid intelligence remained the same. This was an extremely preliminary study with no placebo group, but the results suggest a need for further testing in this subject matter (Prochazkova).

    Conclusion:

    Although research has been done into microdosing, it’s hard to make a finite conclusion about its quantitative effects. There are possible pros to microdosing, but there are also negatives including accidental tripping and cost.

     

    Sources:

    Anderson, Thomas, et al. “Microdosing Psychedelics: Personality, Mental Health, and Creativity Differences in Microdosers.” Psychopharmechology, vol. 236, no. 2, 2019, pp. 731–740., doi:10.31234/osf.io/gk4jd.

    Johnstad, Petter G. “Powerful Substances in Tiny Amounts.” Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, vol. 35, no. 1, 15 Feb. 2018, pp. 39–51., doi:10.1177/1455072517753339.

    Kenakin, Terry P. “Agonist.” Agonist – an Overview, Science Direct, 2009, www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/agonist.

    Nichols, David E. “Psychedelics.” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 68, no. 2, Apr. 2016, pp. 264–355., doi:10.1515/9781400878697-012.

    Prochazkova, Luisa, et al. “Exploring the Effect of Microdosing Psychedelics on Creativity in an Open-Label Natural Setting.” Psychopharmacology, vol. 235, no. 12, 2018, pp. 3401–3413., doi:10.1007/s00213-018-5049-7.

     

  • Nicotine is Dope: a poem on vaping and addiction

    Nicotine is Dope: a poem on vaping and addiction

    What nice etiquette

    Not to be burning a cigarette.

    With flavors like Diet Coke

    Instead of plain old smoke.

    Youth claim to thrive

    On something that resembles a flash drive.

    But wait,

    Maybe we should take five.

     

    It seems vaping has strayed from its original intent.

    It is no longer used to prevent.

    And is now an addictive supplement.

     

    Without trying to overreact,

    Let me present some facts:

    With every juice pod that is drained,

    There are effects on the brain.

    Research shows detriments to the prefrontal cortex –

    An area so important for cognitive development…

    Especially during adolescence!

     

    This is what lower activity in this region can mean:

    Difficulty choosing between

    Or even troubles controlling the obscene…

    Things that, quite frankly, are already hard enough for teens.

     

    So make sure you look for the current research and stats.

    So next time one says it’s healthier than cigarettes,

    You can say, “Well maybe we should chat.”

     

     

     

    References:

    England L, Bunnell RF, Pechacek, et al. Nicotine and the developing human: A neglected element in the electronic cigarette debate. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015;49(2): 286–293.

    Musso F, Bettermann F, Vucurevic G, et al. (2007). Smoking impacts on prefrontal attentional network function in young adult brains. Psychopharmacology. 2007;191(1): 159-169.

    Primack BA, Shensa A, Sidani JE, et al. Initiation of traditional cigarette smoking after electronic cigarette use among tobacco-naïve US young adults. The American Journal of Medicine. 2018;131(4): 443.e441-443.e449.

    Yuan M, Cross SJ, Loughlin SE, Leslie FM. Nicotine and the adolescent brain. Journal of Physiology. 2015;593(16):3397-412.

     

  • Should We Be Worried About Zombie Pathogens?

    Should We Be Worried About Zombie Pathogens?

    In the summer of 2016, Arctic regions such as Siberia and Greenland were hit with an unusual heat wave. As plants grew and water levels rose, a thick layer of permafrost that had accumulated from winters prior began to thaw, revealing something extremely concerning: anthrax-infected reindeer carcasses (Fox-Skelly, 2017).

    That summer a 12-year-old boy in rural Siberia died of anthrax. Dozens of people were hospitalized for the same disease (Goudarzi, 2016). The region had not seen a surge in anthrax cases for over 75 years—so what brought on the sudden outbreak?

    The consensus amongst researchers and Russian officials was that it was caused by the thawing of permafrost (the frozen layer of soil underneath ice and snow) induced by unusually high temperatures. The region saw temperatures around 35 degrees Celsius that summer, or 95 degrees Fahrenheit—much warmer than the usual ten degrees Celsius (Goudarzi, 2016). The warmer the weather the deeper the thaw, potentially releasing decades-old microorganisms from the soil. These microorganisms could be anything from harmless amoeba-consuming “giant” viruses to long-eradicated pathogens such as the smallpox virus—unfortunately in this case, what was unearthed were the carcasses of reindeer that had died from anthrax, allowing the pathogen to leech into food stores and water sources.

    As soon as this story broke out, media outlets took it and ran with it. Suddenly we were faced with what seemed to be a new existential threat to humanity: ancient bacteria and viruses frozen in the ground, coming “back to life” as the earth continues to warm from climate change. “Zombie” pathogens that lied dormant in the ground would infect humans with bygone diseases such as 1918 influenza, smallpox, and bubonic plague. While the idea of dormant bacteria re-infecting humans is terrifying, how valid is it and how concerned should we really be?

    In 2014, evolutionary biologists Jean-Michel Claverie and Chantal Abergel at the Aix-Marseille University in France were able to revive a giant virus, Pithovirus sibericum, that had been dormant in ice for 30,000 years. The virus is 1.5 micrometers long—the largest ever found (Yong, 2014). While it is infectious, its preferred hosts are amoebas and are harmless to humans. This discovery has prompted both the researchers and general public alike to acknowledge the possibility that other more dangerous viruses may also be capable of resurfacing as the Arctic continues to warm.

    However, it’s important to note that Claverie and Abergel’s research pertains to viruses that target amoebas, not ones that targets humans (Doucleff, 2018). While P. sibericum may have been evolutionarily equipped to survive in frozen soil, that may not be the case for viruses responsible for influenza or smallpox that had evolved to thrive in warm human flesh.

    Another piece of information to consider is that Bacillus anthracis, the bacteria that causes anthrax infections, seeping out from the soil and infecting animals is not new. In fact, there are French accounts of anthrax-laden fields wiping out entire flocks of sheep dating back to the medieval period, until Louis Pasteur developed a vaccine against B. anthracis in 1881 (Jones, 2010).

    It’s not as if researchers haven’t tried to revive decades-old human-infecting viruses. There have been multiple attempts to revive the 1918 influenza and smallpox viruses using tissue samples from well-preserved arctic mummies, with varying degrees of success. While the attempt to isolate a living 1918 influenza virus proved unsuccessful, a Russian attempt to revive smallpox did result in their recovering parts of the virus (Taunbenberger, Hultin, & Morens, 2007; Doucleff, 2018).

    At the present moment, the threat of another outbreak of smallpox or Spanish flu is unlikely. These viruses are maladapted to the cold and unable to survive without a warm mammalian host. We may not known what the future holds as climate change uncovers more microorganisms from newly thawed soil, but perhaps we should be more concerned about what goes on in the lab with our attempts to revive long-dead viruses, rather than fixate on the idea of zombie pathogens.

    —

    References

    Doucleff, M. (2018). Are there zombie viruses in the thawing permafrost? https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2018/01/24/575974220/are-there-zombie-viruses-in-the-thawing-permafrost

    Fox-Skelly, J. (2017). There are diseases hidden in ice, and they are waking up. http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170504-there-are-diseases-hidden-in-ice-and-they-are-waking-up

    Goudarzi, S. (2016). What lies beneath. Scientific American, 315, 11-12.

    Jones, S. D. (2010). Death in a Small Package: A Short History of Anthrax. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Taubenberger, J. K., Hultin, J. V., & Morens, D. M. (2007). Discovery and characterization of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus in historical context. Antiviral therapy, 12(4 Pt B), 581–591.

    Yong, E. (2014). Giant virus resurrected from 30,000-year-old-ice. https://www.nature.com/news/giant-virus-resurrected-from-30-000-year-old-ice-1.14801#/ref-link-1

  • Concussions can affect youth

    Concussions can affect youth

    From a young age, many children take up sports like football, boxing, and soccer. Playing such sports can potentially have a huge negative effect if a child or teenager experiences a concussion while playing their game. Depending on the person, the damage could have a lasting effect.

    According to the Mayo Clinic, a concussion is a traumatic brain injury that affects your brain with certain effects being headaches, memory problems and balance problems (Mayo Clinic, 2019). A concussion itself could have a lasting impression on many different children and teenagers. Certain effects of a concussion that could be long term are light sensitivity, photophobia, vertigo, depression, and many more symptoms (“Long Term Effects”, 2018). Although these symptoms are pretty short term, you could potentially have long term effects when you are older, but it can have a significant impact when an individual is still young and their brain is still developing. In a study in Sweden between 1973 and 1985 that observed individuals who had head injuries of people under 25. In these studies, the researchers observed that these people were more likely to have mental health care and not able to graduate or attend college than a person who did not have this injury. Not only that, the individual also had a greater chance of dying prematurely (Reynolds, 2016). Therefore, it is important to know the potential risks of allowing ones’ children in playing such sports.

    With the continuous increase of popularity of sports with young children and teenagers, the likelihood of having a concussion has increased. Approximately 1.6 – 3.8 million sports/recreation-related concussions occur each year within the United States (“What is a concussion”, 2019). With the amount of concussions that occur, there are a large number that occur within individuals who are younger than 20. The Blue Cross Blue Shield reported that there was a 71% increase in the number of concussions for individuals under the age of 20 from the years 2010 to 2015 (“The steep rise”). With the practice of such sports, these are slowly leading to concussions. In the United States, the competitive sports with the most reported concussions is football and it accounts for more than 60% of concussions (“What is a concussion”, 2019). Football is one of the major sports that causes the concussion in males as well and it is one of the major sports that causes concussions from 5 – 18 years. Football itself has caused the most concussion in high school sports and the incident rates of having a concussion was .60 per 1000. In female sports, the most amount of concussions occur in soccer (“Which Youth Sports”). With these specific sports causing concussions in the youth, it is our duty to educate and provide safer measures to help younger people to essentially play the sport in safe manner without any injuries or concussions occurring due to lack of precaution.

    In order to prevent concussions, we as a community need to help those younger understand the risks at hand and allow them to understand the problems with doing such. Essentially have protective headgear when playing a sport that may have cause someone to hit their head is a big thing. Specifically, in soccer, it would be a wise thing to do play with a head gear could prevent some injuries according to specific ratings released by the Virginia Tech Helmet Lab (Staff, 2018). Having such protective measures will allow the youth to develop and prevent them from having certain effects as they grow older.

     

     

    Clinic, M. (2019, March 16). Concussion. Retrieved from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/concussion/symptoms-causes/syc-20355594

    Reynolds, G. (2016, October 5). A Single Concussion May Have Lasting Impact. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/05/well/move/a-single-concussion-may-have-lasting-impact.html.

    Long Term Effects of Post Concussion Syndrome. (0AD). Retrieved from https://www.theraspecs.com/blog/long-term-effects-post-concussion-syndrome/

    staff, S. X. (2018, May 2). Could soccer headgear reduce concussion risk? First-ever ratings say yes. Retrieved from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-05-soccer-headgear-concussion-first-ever.html.

    The steep rise in concussion diagnoses in the U.S. (0AD). Retrieved from https://www.bcbs.com/the-health-of-america/reports/the-steep-rise-concussion-diagnoses-the-us.

    What is a Concussion? (2019). Retrieved from http://www.protectthebrain.org/Brain-Injury-Research/What-is-a-Concussion-.aspx

    Which Youth Sports Cause the Most Concussions? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.medstarsportsmedicine.org/research/which-youth-sports-cause-the-most-concussions/.