Day: January 10, 2020

  • Nicotine is Dope: a poem on vaping and addiction

    Nicotine is Dope: a poem on vaping and addiction

    What nice etiquette

    Not to be burning a cigarette.

    With flavors like Diet Coke

    Instead of plain old smoke.

    Youth claim to thrive

    On something that resembles a flash drive.

    But wait,

    Maybe we should take five.

     

    It seems vaping has strayed from its original intent.

    It is no longer used to prevent.

    And is now an addictive supplement.

     

    Without trying to overreact,

    Let me present some facts:

    With every juice pod that is drained,

    There are effects on the brain.

    Research shows detriments to the prefrontal cortex –

    An area so important for cognitive development…

    Especially during adolescence!

     

    This is what lower activity in this region can mean:

    Difficulty choosing between

    Or even troubles controlling the obscene…

    Things that, quite frankly, are already hard enough for teens.

     

    So make sure you look for the current research and stats.

    So next time one says it’s healthier than cigarettes,

    You can say, “Well maybe we should chat.”

     

     

     

    References:

    England L, Bunnell RF, Pechacek, et al. Nicotine and the developing human: A neglected element in the electronic cigarette debate. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015;49(2): 286–293.

    Musso F, Bettermann F, Vucurevic G, et al. (2007). Smoking impacts on prefrontal attentional network function in young adult brains. Psychopharmacology. 2007;191(1): 159-169.

    Primack BA, Shensa A, Sidani JE, et al. Initiation of traditional cigarette smoking after electronic cigarette use among tobacco-naïve US young adults. The American Journal of Medicine. 2018;131(4): 443.e441-443.e449.

    Yuan M, Cross SJ, Loughlin SE, Leslie FM. Nicotine and the adolescent brain. Journal of Physiology. 2015;593(16):3397-412.

     

  • Should We Be Worried About Zombie Pathogens?

    Should We Be Worried About Zombie Pathogens?

    In the summer of 2016, Arctic regions such as Siberia and Greenland were hit with an unusual heat wave. As plants grew and water levels rose, a thick layer of permafrost that had accumulated from winters prior began to thaw, revealing something extremely concerning: anthrax-infected reindeer carcasses (Fox-Skelly, 2017).

    That summer a 12-year-old boy in rural Siberia died of anthrax. Dozens of people were hospitalized for the same disease (Goudarzi, 2016). The region had not seen a surge in anthrax cases for over 75 years—so what brought on the sudden outbreak?

    The consensus amongst researchers and Russian officials was that it was caused by the thawing of permafrost (the frozen layer of soil underneath ice and snow) induced by unusually high temperatures. The region saw temperatures around 35 degrees Celsius that summer, or 95 degrees Fahrenheit—much warmer than the usual ten degrees Celsius (Goudarzi, 2016). The warmer the weather the deeper the thaw, potentially releasing decades-old microorganisms from the soil. These microorganisms could be anything from harmless amoeba-consuming “giant” viruses to long-eradicated pathogens such as the smallpox virus—unfortunately in this case, what was unearthed were the carcasses of reindeer that had died from anthrax, allowing the pathogen to leech into food stores and water sources.

    As soon as this story broke out, media outlets took it and ran with it. Suddenly we were faced with what seemed to be a new existential threat to humanity: ancient bacteria and viruses frozen in the ground, coming “back to life” as the earth continues to warm from climate change. “Zombie” pathogens that lied dormant in the ground would infect humans with bygone diseases such as 1918 influenza, smallpox, and bubonic plague. While the idea of dormant bacteria re-infecting humans is terrifying, how valid is it and how concerned should we really be?

    In 2014, evolutionary biologists Jean-Michel Claverie and Chantal Abergel at the Aix-Marseille University in France were able to revive a giant virus, Pithovirus sibericum, that had been dormant in ice for 30,000 years. The virus is 1.5 micrometers long—the largest ever found (Yong, 2014). While it is infectious, its preferred hosts are amoebas and are harmless to humans. This discovery has prompted both the researchers and general public alike to acknowledge the possibility that other more dangerous viruses may also be capable of resurfacing as the Arctic continues to warm.

    However, it’s important to note that Claverie and Abergel’s research pertains to viruses that target amoebas, not ones that targets humans (Doucleff, 2018). While P. sibericum may have been evolutionarily equipped to survive in frozen soil, that may not be the case for viruses responsible for influenza or smallpox that had evolved to thrive in warm human flesh.

    Another piece of information to consider is that Bacillus anthracis, the bacteria that causes anthrax infections, seeping out from the soil and infecting animals is not new. In fact, there are French accounts of anthrax-laden fields wiping out entire flocks of sheep dating back to the medieval period, until Louis Pasteur developed a vaccine against B. anthracis in 1881 (Jones, 2010).

    It’s not as if researchers haven’t tried to revive decades-old human-infecting viruses. There have been multiple attempts to revive the 1918 influenza and smallpox viruses using tissue samples from well-preserved arctic mummies, with varying degrees of success. While the attempt to isolate a living 1918 influenza virus proved unsuccessful, a Russian attempt to revive smallpox did result in their recovering parts of the virus (Taunbenberger, Hultin, & Morens, 2007; Doucleff, 2018).

    At the present moment, the threat of another outbreak of smallpox or Spanish flu is unlikely. These viruses are maladapted to the cold and unable to survive without a warm mammalian host. We may not known what the future holds as climate change uncovers more microorganisms from newly thawed soil, but perhaps we should be more concerned about what goes on in the lab with our attempts to revive long-dead viruses, rather than fixate on the idea of zombie pathogens.

    —

    References

    Doucleff, M. (2018). Are there zombie viruses in the thawing permafrost? https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2018/01/24/575974220/are-there-zombie-viruses-in-the-thawing-permafrost

    Fox-Skelly, J. (2017). There are diseases hidden in ice, and they are waking up. http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170504-there-are-diseases-hidden-in-ice-and-they-are-waking-up

    Goudarzi, S. (2016). What lies beneath. Scientific American, 315, 11-12.

    Jones, S. D. (2010). Death in a Small Package: A Short History of Anthrax. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Taubenberger, J. K., Hultin, J. V., & Morens, D. M. (2007). Discovery and characterization of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus in historical context. Antiviral therapy, 12(4 Pt B), 581–591.

    Yong, E. (2014). Giant virus resurrected from 30,000-year-old-ice. https://www.nature.com/news/giant-virus-resurrected-from-30-000-year-old-ice-1.14801#/ref-link-1

  • Concussions can affect youth

    Concussions can affect youth

    From a young age, many children take up sports like football, boxing, and soccer. Playing such sports can potentially have a huge negative effect if a child or teenager experiences a concussion while playing their game. Depending on the person, the damage could have a lasting effect.

    According to the Mayo Clinic, a concussion is a traumatic brain injury that affects your brain with certain effects being headaches, memory problems and balance problems (Mayo Clinic, 2019). A concussion itself could have a lasting impression on many different children and teenagers. Certain effects of a concussion that could be long term are light sensitivity, photophobia, vertigo, depression, and many more symptoms (“Long Term Effects”, 2018). Although these symptoms are pretty short term, you could potentially have long term effects when you are older, but it can have a significant impact when an individual is still young and their brain is still developing. In a study in Sweden between 1973 and 1985 that observed individuals who had head injuries of people under 25. In these studies, the researchers observed that these people were more likely to have mental health care and not able to graduate or attend college than a person who did not have this injury. Not only that, the individual also had a greater chance of dying prematurely (Reynolds, 2016). Therefore, it is important to know the potential risks of allowing ones’ children in playing such sports.

    With the continuous increase of popularity of sports with young children and teenagers, the likelihood of having a concussion has increased. Approximately 1.6 – 3.8 million sports/recreation-related concussions occur each year within the United States (“What is a concussion”, 2019). With the amount of concussions that occur, there are a large number that occur within individuals who are younger than 20. The Blue Cross Blue Shield reported that there was a 71% increase in the number of concussions for individuals under the age of 20 from the years 2010 to 2015 (“The steep rise”). With the practice of such sports, these are slowly leading to concussions. In the United States, the competitive sports with the most reported concussions is football and it accounts for more than 60% of concussions (“What is a concussion”, 2019). Football is one of the major sports that causes the concussion in males as well and it is one of the major sports that causes concussions from 5 – 18 years. Football itself has caused the most concussion in high school sports and the incident rates of having a concussion was .60 per 1000. In female sports, the most amount of concussions occur in soccer (“Which Youth Sports”). With these specific sports causing concussions in the youth, it is our duty to educate and provide safer measures to help younger people to essentially play the sport in safe manner without any injuries or concussions occurring due to lack of precaution.

    In order to prevent concussions, we as a community need to help those younger understand the risks at hand and allow them to understand the problems with doing such. Essentially have protective headgear when playing a sport that may have cause someone to hit their head is a big thing. Specifically, in soccer, it would be a wise thing to do play with a head gear could prevent some injuries according to specific ratings released by the Virginia Tech Helmet Lab (Staff, 2018). Having such protective measures will allow the youth to develop and prevent them from having certain effects as they grow older.

     

     

    Clinic, M. (2019, March 16). Concussion. Retrieved from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/concussion/symptoms-causes/syc-20355594

    Reynolds, G. (2016, October 5). A Single Concussion May Have Lasting Impact. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/05/well/move/a-single-concussion-may-have-lasting-impact.html.

    Long Term Effects of Post Concussion Syndrome. (0AD). Retrieved from https://www.theraspecs.com/blog/long-term-effects-post-concussion-syndrome/

    staff, S. X. (2018, May 2). Could soccer headgear reduce concussion risk? First-ever ratings say yes. Retrieved from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-05-soccer-headgear-concussion-first-ever.html.

    The steep rise in concussion diagnoses in the U.S. (0AD). Retrieved from https://www.bcbs.com/the-health-of-america/reports/the-steep-rise-concussion-diagnoses-the-us.

    What is a Concussion? (2019). Retrieved from http://www.protectthebrain.org/Brain-Injury-Research/What-is-a-Concussion-.aspx

    Which Youth Sports Cause the Most Concussions? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.medstarsportsmedicine.org/research/which-youth-sports-cause-the-most-concussions/.

  • Health Shot: Vaccines

    Health Shot: Vaccines

     

    I’m sure we can all remember that dreaded moment at the doctor’s office when they say “Time for some shots!”. Much crying later (maybe that’s just me) , we leave the office with a brightly colored band aid – and sometimes a sticker for the road. But what exactly goes on in these shots we receive from such a young age? What do these vaccinations do in our bodies? Moreover, what explains the origins of the the anti-vax movement?

    What happens when we get sick?

    When bacteria and viruses enter the body, immune cells called help fight off these invaders, which are called antigens. These antigens trigger the response by the body to fight them off with T Cells and B Cells. B Cells make antibodies, which are proteins produced by our immune system that help attack the antigens. Each antibody fits like a puzzle piece with a particular antigen and blocks off the antigen from communicating with other cells. This causes the antigen to die off. T Cells secrete chemical signals in the body that let other immune responses know to activate. Once the body has begun to eliminate the microbes faster than they reproduce, and the disease is eliminated, some of the T and B cells convert into memory cells can recognize the infectious microbe if it appears again and appropriately release antibodies. This offensive cycle of recognize, react, and remember allows our body to be very effective in responding to bacteria and viruses we interact with every day.

    How do vaccines help?

    Vaccines allow the body to be exposed to an illness and developed the memory cells, so that when we are exposed again to the microbe, we can quickly react. The vaccine contains a weakened form of the virus that does not cause the disease or reproduce very well – but this enough to get our bodies into action. Following the same cycle as above, the body fights off this weakened disease and is left with the memory T and B cells that cause future protection. Since the disease is in weakened form, many vaccines require more than one dose. In the case of the flu vaccine, the CDC recommends a vaccination every year since the vaccination is updated each year to include the strains that research suggests would be most pervasive that flu season.

    Where did the Autism-Vaccine link come from?

    In 1998, Andrew J Wakefield along with 12 co-authors published a study suggesting that from 12 cases, they found links between the MMR vaccination and autism in The Lancet. Though the paper could not support a causal relationship between the MMR vaccination and autism, in a video Wakefield suggested that the risk of autism was developing with the combined MMR vaccines. The press reaction to the publication and Wakefields statements were immediate, and parents in Britain and the United States began to delay vaccinations for their children.

    Ideas Debunked:

    In 2004, the editor of the Lancet revealed that the Wakefield has been paid by attorneys looking to file lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers, demonstrating a clear conflict of interest and ulterior motive. In 2010, after many of the co-authors had redacted their statements in the paper, The Lancet redacted the paper itself.

    In 2011, The British Medical Journal published a report by Brian Deer who investigated how Wakefield could have made the statements he did in the 1998 paper. Deer found that while the paper claimed eight children showed autism-like symptoms days after the vaccination, in fact only two showed symptoms that they had even before the vaccine was administered. With all this evidence, researchers agree that the original study should not have been published as the results could be categorized as research fraud.

    After the MMR-Autism hypothesis was no longer held, critics cited thimerosal, a preservative containing mercury as a possible cause for autism. In the late 1990’s concern for eating mercury present in a different form in fish heightened, and people turned their eyes to the mercury used in vaccines. A final report published in 2004 by the Institute of Medicine rejected an association between thimerosal and autism. However, today most childhood vaccines no longer contain thimerosal.

    Since autism rates have continued to increase since the onset of routine vaccination, critics continue to question vaccines. Research from the Autism Speaks associate reveals that autism is causes by both genetic and environmental factors. The exact reason why autism develops is still unclear, but vaccinations have been currently ruled out as a cause.

    The Anti-Vax Movement:

    In 2007, celebrity Jenny McCarthy’s son was diagnosed with Autism, and she blamed the diagnosis on the effect of vaccinations. This essentially kickstarted the recent anti-vax movement again, though the movement has been in existence since vaccines were widespread. The recent advent of Facebook and twitter has increased the spread of misinformation and has increased vaccines refusal across America. With the popularity of the anti-vax movement, the herd immunity of our population is threatened. For highly contagious diseases, herd immunity is achieved when 90-95% of the population is vaccinated. For less contagious diseases, like polio, 80-85% is enough. Herd immunity is precisely why anti-vax movement affect those who still choose to get immunized. Turning into a Tragedy of the Commons, one  misinformed individual can affect the health safety of their surrounding community. For this reason, staying informed with well established facts, rather than opinions, is important when dealing with medical issues.

    Sources:

    Vaccines Protect Your Community. (2017, December). Retrieved March 10, 19, from https://www.vaccines.gov/basics/work/protection

    How Do Vaccines Work? (2019, April 09). Retrieved from https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/how-vaccines-work

    Understand how Vaccines work. (2018, July). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf

    Do Vaccines Cause Autism? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/do-vaccines-cause-autism

    Wakefield, A. J. (1999). MMR vaccination and autism. The Lancet,354(9182), 949-950. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)75696-8

     

  • Computer Programming: A Women’s History

    Computer Programming: A Women’s History

    I always found it interesting how people tend to see computer science and coding in general as inherently a male-dominated field, despite how the very foundations of computer programming were established by a woman, Ada Lovelace. In the 60s, computer programming was considered women’s work (look at the work of Dorothy Vaughan). The code that send us to the moon was predominantly written by a woman, Margaret Hamilton. In fact, in the days of the Atari and early gaming systems, many legendary game developers were also women (Carol Shaw, Donna Bailey, and Roberta Williams, just to name a few). And today, MIT’s Katie Bouman and her team are the first to ever capture an image of a black hole. Computer science may appear to be a male-dominated field, but we can’t forget that the pioneers of the field were women. This is my tribute to just three of those extraordinary female programmers.